Episode 103

full
Published on:

7th Feb 2024

Rabble Rants: Turning up the Heat on the Political Elite

Topic 1: Canadian political elites worried?

Relentless pressure from activists was too much for the BC NDP to handle, forcing MLA Selina Robinson to lose her position in the Cabinet. This has politicians and their inner circles closing ranks around and pushing back against the more aggressive tactics being deployed by grassroots activists.

What has them so worried?

Topic 2: Nicaragua Put Complicit Countries on Notice

With the possibility of another ICJ trial in the news, this time with Canada as a target has our hosts looking at International Law and its obvious limitations.

Topic 3: Canada's Special Visa Program for Gaza

This is not the humanitarian gesture it was sold as. The shortcomings, paired with other foreign policy moves this week seem very performative.

Our hosts discuss these and other updates related to the siege on Gaza.

____________________

All of our content is free - made possible by the generous sponsorships of our Patrons. If you would like to support us: Patreon

Follow us on Instagram

Resources:

Transcript
Speaker:

There is so much out there to get mad about. Social injustices, class warfare, continued

Speaker:

colonization, the act of destruction of our planet by those focused on prophets and not

Speaker:

people. We can find it overwhelming at times. The good news is there are equally as many,

Speaker:

if not more, stories of people coming together and rising up against the forces at play. So

Speaker:

the creators of Blueprints of Disruption have added a new weekly segment, Ravel Rants, where

Speaker:

we will unpack the stories that have us most riled up, share calls to action, and most importantly,

Speaker:

celebrate resistance. Welcome back to Ravel Rants. We've got a lot to talk about today.

Speaker:

We're gonna keep talking about Palestine, though as usual, it will have that Canadian connection.

Speaker:

We really need to update you from the stories that we included in our last rabble rant, namely

Speaker:

MLA Selena Robinson and her downfall. We're also going to talk about reports coming out

Speaker:

of Nicaragua and perhaps an ICJ case looming against Canada. We're also going to get into

Speaker:

Canada's so-called special visa program and the other performative shit that's coming out

Speaker:

of our federal government. But... Like I said, an update on Selena Robinson. So Santiago,

Speaker:

she did get some punishment, right? In our last episode, we were really frustrated that almost

Speaker:

nobody, but I think Charlie Angus at that point, and Matthew Green came out quickly soon after.

Speaker:

We did see Jagmeet Singh make a statement a little bit wishy washy. There were some folks

Speaker:

that were very clear within the NDP that they were displeased with. MLA Robinson, but surely

Speaker:

it was the relentless actions of activists that solidified her resignation from the, her minister's

Speaker:

position. So she's still in MLA. She's trying to hold onto that. She's still in the party,

Speaker:

but she's not in the cabinet anymore. This didn't get a lot of airtime, but her position in the

Speaker:

cabinet is actually significant. She was in charge of post-secondary education. And she

Speaker:

had used that position to have a teacher fired for their Palestinian views. And so it's really

Speaker:

ironic that there's backlash to the backlash when the person being targeted here has a history

Speaker:

of holding people accountable for their political views, if they don't jive with the folks that

Speaker:

make decisions. And I think a lot of people are trying to argue that it shouldn't be the

Speaker:

electorate. or constituents or NDP members that should actually determine if she stays in office.

Speaker:

So when I say the activists were relentless, I mean, they showed up at a caucus retreat

Speaker:

and it looked like some of them from the videos that they posted got inside. And what really

Speaker:

frustrated me was you could hear them calling for the MLAs that they could get into eyeshot

Speaker:

with, calling them by name. with a real familiar tone as though they've worked with them before.

Speaker:

And I imagine if you're an activist in BC, you've had to work with members of the ruling party,

Speaker:

especially the NDP at this point. And so, but that got them nowhere. The political class

Speaker:

is really closing ranks on this issue. And I think that's for multiple reasons, not just

Speaker:

because some of them actually hold Zionist views. but because they didn't like the way that their

Speaker:

own base held them accountable. They didn't like the way they were potentially being removed

Speaker:

from office without having an election. It's, it's, they're always trying to drive home this

Speaker:

artificial point that the ballot box is the be-all end-all of democracy. And everything

Speaker:

outside of that is labeled as like intimidation, harassment. Premier Ebb use that old line that

Speaker:

we've heard so many times in the NDP, at least people who are trying to reform it, that those

Speaker:

protesters were just trying to divide the party, right? Trying to sow discord in politics, like

Speaker:

that was their only goal and it wasn't to actually hold somebody accountable. So I'm actually

Speaker:

loving how the ruling political class and adjacent are. really upset about the backlash that Robinson

Speaker:

faced. Yeah, there's a certain level of irony there though, isn't there? Talking about, you

Speaker:

know, ballot box and democracy as, you know, David Eby, how did he get into power? I mean,

Speaker:

at the end of the day, it was uncontested because they expelled the only candidate that was running

Speaker:

against them, right? So it's not like the ballot box got him there in the first place, right?

Speaker:

And I think that there's, you know, I don't know if I was expecting them to remove her,

Speaker:

but I think it's important to like, you know, because everyone's drawing the comparisons

Speaker:

between this and Sarah Jama, right? And it needs to be mentioned like, yeah, they didn't do

Speaker:

this out of a sense of morality or what is right, you know, they did this, as you said, because

Speaker:

of the pressure. And it took them. quite a few days to do so, right? It's not like with Sarah

Speaker:

Jammer, which was quick, right? This was, they had to because of the pressure. Yeah, Robinson,

Speaker:

you know, tried to issue an apology. We talked about that in the last episode and then they

Speaker:

tried to seed a little bit more by agreeing to take anti-Islamophobia training, which I

Speaker:

need to point out is like not the issue. again, not all Palestinians are Muslim, and it's a

Speaker:

very unique type of racism that Palestinians and their allies face. And it needs to be named

Speaker:

that way, in the fact that they couldn't even acknowledge or say Palestine in response to

Speaker:

all of that she's done in the past few months. Because in the end, it wasn't just those statements

Speaker:

and a few tweets that she— People then poured over her accounts that she's now deleted. And

Speaker:

it was endless by her and her husband just completely perpetuating the worst Zionist narratives.

Speaker:

Some things that even Zionists don't even try to argue, like that all Jewish people have

Speaker:

a birthright to Israel. And that it was just astonishing, the breadth of it. And she has

Speaker:

been elected since 2013. I imagine people have encountered her racism many, many times over

Speaker:

and she's maintained power. So it's absolutely to the credit of the people who put pressure

Speaker:

in all kinds of ways. I mean, they were forced to cancel a big fundraiser and that would have

Speaker:

cost them a lot of money, right? They'd already booked the venue, everything. It was probably

Speaker:

the day before that they canceled. So they were really feeling the heat in BC. and rightly

Speaker:

so. But then you have folks like Abby Lewis coming out this morning and calling the action

Speaker:

outside of Selena Robinson's office childish and feeding into our detractors narrative that

Speaker:

it was just inherently anti-Semitic because she's Jewish. It was Post-It notes and shock.

Speaker:

And again, it's like that episode we did with Skye Johnson where papers on windows are getting

Speaker:

people to really clutch their pearls and frame it as something more than what it is. And I

Speaker:

think, again, that goes back to the point of the ruling elite just being really afraid.

Speaker:

They're seeing themselves in these politicians, even if they're not elected. And they don't

Speaker:

like that idea. They don't want to be a Melanie Jolie and have their house and their neighborhood

Speaker:

disrupted. And Like I've said before, I believe it is part of their role to rein us in, always.

Speaker:

These folks that, especially folks like Avi Lewis and Naomi Klein, because we know that

Speaker:

they know the urgency. Like if you're talking about climate action or if you're talking about

Speaker:

stopping a genocide in Palestine and they're like what then advocating for really measured

Speaker:

responses and... stick to petitions and respectful protest. And that's the opposite of what the

Speaker:

movement needs to progress. And it's always from this really privileged political position

Speaker:

where they're used to getting a phone call back from people they need to speak to. They're

Speaker:

used to having a huge platform, book tours, where they can share their ideas and people

Speaker:

will listen and then share on. Not everybody has that access. Some people need to leave

Speaker:

post-it notes on their MLAs window because that's the only time they can actually communicate

Speaker:

with them. Your emails don't actually go to them. Your phone calls don't get through to

Speaker:

them. And it's again, this political elitist class trying to cut off avenues for actual

Speaker:

change, right? And trying to keep us in this really narrow definition of protest. And they

Speaker:

have no right to be doing that. You know, it comes back to the conversation we had last

Speaker:

episode, I think about standards, right? The standards that were held to versus the standards

Speaker:

that they're held to, right? Because this is the most tame shit. Like, some chalk, some

Speaker:

papers that can be taken down, you know? That is incredibly, incredibly mild. Like, there's

Speaker:

no actual permanent... damage here whatsoever. It's people communicating with their politicians

Speaker:

and holding them accountable. And I mentioned the double standards because, you know, look

Speaker:

at how much it took for something, for action to be taken. It took blatantly racist comments.

Speaker:

It took a pattern of blatantly racist comments. You know, this was something that has been

Speaker:

happening over time. It took all of this public outrage and it still took them days to come

Speaker:

to this decision. That is not the standard that we're held to whatsoever. It's not fair and

Speaker:

it's fucked up, but that's the situation. We know who has the power here. Like we know where

Speaker:

the loyalties of those in power lie. And it's not with the people who are putting up messages

Speaker:

with chalk. It's with... the people who get outraged at messages with chalk. One thing

Speaker:

that bugs me about what Avi Lewis did as well was not just that he criticized a tactic, which

Speaker:

I really don't appreciate, especially when it comes from the powerful, to be honest.

Speaker:

But that wasn't it. It was like he was pleading with journalists to do the right thing. please

Speaker:

don't associate this with the movement. As though one, he spoke for the fucking movement, which

Speaker:

I don't know how that's possible. That's a really arrogant way to position yourself. But two,

Speaker:

be pleading with the same people who have already set this narrative that anything that they

Speaker:

do is a pro-Khamas, anti-Jewish hate rally. You know, there's already that narrative that

Speaker:

exists in the media and he's pleading with them? Like, please, please don't judge me by those

Speaker:

actions. Like, how dare you? How dare you? And I'm gonna give a little bit of, maybe I won't.

Speaker:

I mean, I'll say that like it's quite ironic and given his history, right? You know, I've

Speaker:

talked to Javi Lewis before and, you know, he, for example, has told me, Like he's about,

Speaker:

oh yeah, you know, I apologize and condemn for the actions of my family, my dad and grandfather.

Speaker:

They were people who were some of the people involved in breaking up the waffle back in

Speaker:

the day, right? Then he's going and doing the same things, right? Yeah, like moderating the

Speaker:

left, trying to keep us kind of bottled up. That's how it feels. Like, especially with

Speaker:

you and I working so hard to get people to realize their power and to explore so many avenues

Speaker:

to pressure power and to build community and solidarity. And it's just, it feels like they're

Speaker:

trying to do the opposite, but with the same fucking knowledge that we have. And so that

Speaker:

really makes me mad. And I could spend time criticizing the fact that, you know, Lisa McLeod

Speaker:

is also up in arms about how we are harassing politicians and that conservatives think exactly

Speaker:

the same way Selena Robinson does. And clearly a lot of liberals, right? Melanie Jolie will

Speaker:

not go on skate in this episode. But the reason I end up focusing on the NDP or people that

Speaker:

present themselves as leftists is because, again, like I said, they know better, but they have

Speaker:

this sphere of influence in the same set of people we're going to need to rely on to do

Speaker:

something more. And so if they are listening to them and holding them on the pedestal that

Speaker:

we tend to do with people, especially rich people, especially people who have platforms, you know,

Speaker:

that's what platforms are. right, pedestals. And they have the ability to prevent meaningful

Speaker:

change. And I wonder if they know that they're doing it, if it's that discomfort that they

Speaker:

just naturally feel, especially coming from a political family, like do they see daddy's

Speaker:

office being plastered and vandalized and harassed at dinner and they just don't want that for

Speaker:

them or themselves? Or is it like, do they think it's actually a bad tactical maneuver? And

Speaker:

if I would say that they're wrong, but they're entitled to have a difference of opinion, but

Speaker:

they're not entitled to use those platforms to actually slam people who are doing good

Speaker:

work or doing work. Like, you don't have to agree with everybody's tactics, right? But

Speaker:

like, stop drawing the line of fucking post-it notes and shock. Like, surely there's further

Speaker:

extremes you're going to allow people to go to stop a genocide. Yeah, yeah, no, it's one

Speaker:

of these things where it's like, in this current moment, saying these things is just so particularly

Speaker:

offensive, I think. Right? Because we should be doing much more. I mean, you know, in Montreal,

Speaker:

they were just blocking up some train tracks, you know, there's been, you know, the barricading

Speaker:

of some arms manufacturers in Canada, you know, good work. stuff that we should be doing. It's

Speaker:

a lot more direct than some chalk. Like some chalk is like what I expect. These things are

Speaker:

what I, and it's the same thing, you know, like in Humber, you know, a student was going around

Speaker:

putting stickers and they got kicked out for it. I mean, eventually they had to apologize

Speaker:

to him, but it's, you know, it's the same thing where it's like, really, is this that offensive

Speaker:

to you? Is this that inconvenient for you? Get like some... Get a hose, wash it away. We'll

Speaker:

come back and chalk it up again. But like, fuck, this takes minimal effort for you to address.

Speaker:

This is not an inconvenience on you. You know what is an inconvenience? Genocide. A lot more

Speaker:

than an inconvenience. And that's what's happening. And we're directly complicit and responsible

Speaker:

in it. So like, focus, like, I don't know about you. Like, I'm pretty tired, you know, running

Speaker:

around, lots of things going on. I had to pick and choose where I spend my energy right now,

Speaker:

you know? There's a lot more happening than what I can possibly address or participate

Speaker:

in, so I had to pick and choose. I can't imagine being in a position where I'd have the energy

Speaker:

to be talking about chalk instead of talking about a genocide, you know? I cannot fathom

Speaker:

that. So like, fuck off.

Speaker:

Like, it's almost comical to have to, like, I don't know what to say about this, fuck off.

Speaker:

Like. Okay, I'm gonna give them a kernel of credibility in that clearly it's not the chalk

Speaker:

or the post-it notes that's really upsetting. I think it's just the overall harassment like

Speaker:

the thing was plastered. really plastered and that's kind of hit in the feels of some folks

Speaker:

who that were talking about but there was the use of the word Nazi that has triggered a certain

Speaker:

response. Obviously the word Nazi, when you're also talking about a Jewish person, will invoke

Speaker:

certain, you know, intergenerational trauma, shall we say? So, this is a difficult one for

Speaker:

me because I don't tend to use that language to describe Israel, but not because you can't

Speaker:

make a fair comparison. I, that is, that can be done. But it's because it generates responses

Speaker:

like this, this knee-jerk reaction almost shuts down the conversation, very reactive language.

Speaker:

However, I will defend people's right to do it because it is not a form of Holocaust denial.

Speaker:

It's not antisemitism. Surely that's obvious now. as we see the remaining population of

Speaker:

Gaza, with much of Palestine now, pushed into a tiny parcel of land that's now surrounded

Speaker:

by openly genocidal troops that have proven bent on eliminating everything Palestinian

Speaker:

or adjacent, and they have been squeezing these people and isolating them and exiling them

Speaker:

and killing them because of who they are for many, many years. And it's all based on an

Speaker:

ideology that pins one type of person as more worthy than others, and spends a lot of its

Speaker:

resources dehumanizing and isolating a certain set of peoples and torturing them slowly. So

Speaker:

there's fucking parallels to be made, right? But the Holocaust was fucking horrific, that's

Speaker:

the point, because this is horrific. This has the same patterns. And it was It's the same

Speaker:

attempt to scapegoat, remove, and then erase an entire set of people who don't fit a certain

Speaker:

image. And people should be allowed to make those comparisons, but they should also know,

Speaker:

like we talked in the last episode about like protecting the movement and making certain

Speaker:

calls about messaging, then sometimes when you use certain messaging, although it might be

Speaker:

valid, it causes problems that you perhaps shouldn't have had to deal with. don't want to deal with.

Speaker:

Right? So that's a tough one. I get that. But at the same time, it comes back to like just

Speaker:

the current moment and, you know, the overwhelming amount of things that are happening. And it's

Speaker:

like, you know, I just could not imagine that catching my attention more than other things,

Speaker:

you know? But you're not Jewish. No, I know. But in Canadian education, we know that like

Speaker:

we're taught. very clearly about, you know, World War II, the Nazis, this is like the great

Speaker:

evil. It's what comes, when horrible things happen, it's what comes to mind. Like, I get

Speaker:

that, right? Is there a level of sensitivity we had? Of course there is. But look at what

Speaker:

we're talking about right now. Like, we're talking about an active genocide being occurred. Like,

Speaker:

maybe there are bigger things to focus on, you know? Just... Perhaps. I just, I don't have,

Speaker:

like right now, and I guess I'll segue a little bit here, but you know, Nicaragua was just

Speaker:

sending a message to Canada, UK, Germany, and Netherlands about the possibility of taking

Speaker:

them to the ICJ over complicits, complicitness, of being complicit. in genocide, right? They

Speaker:

send a very strongly worded memo about this, talking about, you know, the continued arms,

Speaker:

the continued support financially with arms to Israel, the cutting off of UNRWA, which

Speaker:

they describe as collective punishment, which, you know, again, not allowed, and, you know,

Speaker:

the lack of action because Once there is even the possibility of a genocide happening, it

Speaker:

demands action, yet everything we're doing is doubling down, right? That was happening at

Speaker:

the same time as all of these things. This has been happening for a few days now. It's gotten

Speaker:

very, very little attention, but it's showing, you know, the eyes of the world are seeing

Speaker:

what's going on here in Canada. They're seeing the actions of our government. And yet, what

Speaker:

are we focusing on? You know, these are people in power with platforms. Are they doing everything

Speaker:

in their ability to hold Canada accountable? No, they're part of it. I just, I just don't

Speaker:

have a lot of room for them to be making moral arguments when they're failing to their moral

Speaker:

obligations, you know, like we'll criticize. When people in our movement step out of line,

Speaker:

you know, we. We're happy to do that because we're living up to our end of things as much

Speaker:

as we can. You don't get to do that if you're not doing what you have to do. And when you're

Speaker:

someone in power, when Avi Lewis, for example, has a fucking massive platform, he talks, people

Speaker:

listen. Is he doing everything he could do? No, I don't think so. And it's one of those

Speaker:

things where I have a lot of room for understanding of like, everyone has their own. own limitations

Speaker:

of how much energy they can or cannot put into something, he can be doing more. And not doing

Speaker:

it to me, just shut up. Don't talk. Like I don't want to hear you if you're not. And definitely

Speaker:

don't claim to represent me. You know, you trying to talk for the movement, you don't talk for

Speaker:

me. I wanna go back to that Nicaragua memorandum that went out to folks that I know you're still

Speaker:

trying to dig up some details and it's still to be seen how that goes, but it really does

Speaker:

open up a discussion on. Canada being named in the very few countries that are named. Now,

Speaker:

folks might notice that the United States isn't in the list of countries that Nicaragua has

Speaker:

targeted in, and surely a case can be made, or the case can be made that Israel, I even

Speaker:

get them mixed up, that the United States is more than complicit in this, but when I went

Speaker:

to go find what I could, you Google, Nicaragua and the ICJ and you get hits on a case from

Speaker:

1984 where Nicaragua took the United States to the same court we saw South Africa and Israel

Speaker:

in. They were challenging the U.S. on their usual tactics of supplying, arming, training

Speaker:

paramilitaries to operate within Nicaragua and also using their own U.S. military to operate

Speaker:

on sovereign Nicaraguan soil and they won, obviously, because there's no lack of evidence that the

Speaker:

United States not only does this, but has a pattern of doing this. And although the United

Speaker:

States showed up at court at first and used the same Israeli tactic of trying to say, you

Speaker:

know, you don't have jurisdiction over us, like, I don't know why the world court wouldn't and

Speaker:

why the world court gets to decide. And then in turn, yes, we do. But either way, that's

Speaker:

what happened. So once that happened, United States, well, we're just not coming anymore.

Speaker:

So they just stopped showing up the proceedings. Obviously the ruling went against them and

Speaker:

nothing happened from it. They just ignored it. They pretended it didn't happen and it

Speaker:

really didn't benefit Nicaragua all that much. I mean, I'm sure they felt very validated and

Speaker:

history will show that that's in fact exactly what the United States was doing there. but

Speaker:

it just speaks to that conversation around international law and how we're gonna hold these countries,

Speaker:

including our own, accountable. And I don't think it's those institutions that are gonna

Speaker:

do it, right? If you want Melanesia Lee to know just how horrible her actions are and Trudeau,

Speaker:

I think you are gonna have to show up and fight their house. You are gonna have to make sure

Speaker:

they cannot dine in peace. You are gonna have to remove them from their positions because

Speaker:

otherwise all these avenues are kind of just... set up as performative and resource wasting,

Speaker:

frankly, you know, like it's great to have validation, but we've had no impact on Israel since the

Speaker:

ICJ ruling. I know, you know, Dimitri and we spent a good chunk of that episode talking

Speaker:

about the positives, like the confirmation that kind of came from that and that it, you know,

Speaker:

it didn't ask for a ceasefire. But in... It did. However, as we anticipated, it has not

Speaker:

really manufactured anything for the people of Gaza. They have not seen the fruits of that

Speaker:

at all. So, and our government has not responded in a way, like you mentioned, that says that

Speaker:

this court ruling happened. They've doubled down. We just need Melanesia Lee sanction Hamas.

Speaker:

What the fuck?

Speaker:

It's one of those things where it's like, if Canada on October 7th comes out and says, we're

Speaker:

sanctioning the leaders of Hamas, yada yada, you're making a statement here. To do it early

Speaker:

February, after the ICJ ruling, after everything, kind of out of nowhere, it kind of speaks volumes

Speaker:

about... what kind of message they're trying to send to us. You know, I think Melanie Jolie

Speaker:

has just, oh God, she's been absolutely awful. I think she makes Chrisia Freeland very proud.

Speaker:

Like the CBC Pitchbot is not satire anymore. It stopped being satire like a hundred days

Speaker:

ago. Someone fund the CBC Pitchbot to actually do coverage because I'm guaranteed it'll do

Speaker:

better journalism than the CBC at this point. non-stop get it they get it like you guys haven't

Speaker:

done enough damage already like Withdrawing aid and now trying to sanction Hamas and sure

Speaker:

yeah, okay I get what you're saying about if they had done it earlier I mean people would

Speaker:

have been totally justified you get it and I'm not saying that things that happened on October

Speaker:

7th are Are to be celebrated. All right, but at this point At this point, there's only one

Speaker:

set of people with arms that are willing to stop snipers, Israeli snipers from shooting

Speaker:

children. Right? Like, we are watching a set of people that are now herded into a tiny area.

Speaker:

Leaflets are being dropped on Rafah, the last place, and ground troops are encircling it.

Speaker:

Carpet bombing is happening in this last safe zone. And the only people, the only armed entity

Speaker:

to the Houthi rebels, okay, so no, that's not right, but okay, so the only armed entities

Speaker:

that dare stop them, whether it be Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthi rebels, Iran, they're all

Speaker:

just immediately painted as bad guys and you want to disarm them all. But also at the same

Speaker:

time, you're not willing to like send in your peacekeepers. You're not willing to sanction

Speaker:

Israel. You're still arming them to the teeth. Like at what point does this not become insane?

Speaker:

Are peacekeepers even still a thing? Like, like I remember learning about that in elementary

Speaker:

school and thinking, Oh, that's the coolest thing ever. You know, it's that that's not

Speaker:

a thing. Right. Like. You think that they would have already sent them if it was a thing. It's

Speaker:

a very selective thing. I think we've no one's really met their obligations in terms of peacekeeping.

Speaker:

They've not ever been peacekeepers. So, like, I hope everyone heard the irony in my voice

Speaker:

when I said that. And that's the thing is that, like, you know, Canada, you know, Lester B.

Speaker:

Pearson was supposed to be like the founder of that whole thing, right? We're it's supposed

Speaker:

to be part of like I was taught as a kid that like that was Canadian identity, the Canada

Speaker:

goes. to ensure peace in the world. Now we're like, Israel has a right to carpet bomb whoever

Speaker:

they want to carpet bomb for whatever reason that they want to carpet bomb, which I mean,

Speaker:

that's a subtext behind it all, right? And I mean, like there are performative things that

Speaker:

we could be doing that we're not doing. You know what I mean? There are like things that

Speaker:

don't change anything at all. Like we could be putting out messages like we strongly condemn.

Speaker:

the killing of any civilians and we ask Israel to cease hostilities.

Speaker:

We could be performative about this. We could be saying things and not actually changing

Speaker:

anything. We're not even doing that. Oh, we are. I've got one for that. I got one for that

Speaker:

category. Our so-called special visa program for... people trapped in Gaza. So, you know,

Speaker:

we're good. We welcome refugees, right? We brought over tens of thousands of Ukrainian refugees

Speaker:

and yeah, fundraisers. You know, we have these special kind of visa programs that they instituted

Speaker:

here for getting people out of Gaza who had family here in Canada. And the liberals were

Speaker:

celebrated. We, you know. Total disclaimer, we've always been wary of the attempt to relocate

Speaker:

Palestinians as the only mechanism of Canadian involvement. I mean, that's just feeding into

Speaker:

the exile of more Palestinians. But people do need to escape Gaza, right? Folks are injured,

Speaker:

folks want to get out of there for obvious reasons. And so our special visa program, now if you've

Speaker:

heard our other episode, a reminder that Israel holds the secure- the last say on security

Speaker:

clearance for these folks. So to start, but it's only for a thousand people and for three

Speaker:

years only. And those people that qualify have to agree that their family will support them

Speaker:

the entire time. So that means no social assistance. It's likely not even a working visa. You have

Speaker:

to have. at least economically stable relatives over here that will look after you for three

Speaker:

years and the premises after three years they're going to send you back. I don't... Average

Speaker:

Canadian can't afford a $500 emergency. Where the hell are people going to have the money

Speaker:

to support people like that? Come on. Yeah, and not only that, in three years, what are

Speaker:

we facing? We don't even know what Gaza will look like in three years. We don't know if

Speaker:

Israel will allow them to return. That part is just a farce to begin with. But Santiago,

Speaker:

1,000 people are allowed to escape. And we are, what, 130 days into this. Guess how many people

Speaker:

have qualified under that program? Did anyone? No. Not one. And there's a CBC story that I'll

Speaker:

link. And It talks about a family that was essentially wiped out while waiting for a response. There's

Speaker:

like a third step to the qualification process. My guess, my speculation is that's the security

Speaker:

clearance part and likely being held up by Israel, but I wouldn't put it past us to have just

Speaker:

made this entire visa program another one of your performative things that we're talking

Speaker:

about. where we said we would pull people out, we would do family reunification, and we never

Speaker:

had any intention of doing that at all. And there won't even be people left to bring over

Speaker:

on the list because there's nowhere left safe in Gaza. Have you seen the charts where it

Speaker:

shows, you know, population density in Gaza versus where the bombing in Gaza has happened?

Speaker:

When we talk about there's nowhere safe, it's there bombing everywhere where there's people.

Speaker:

Yeah, those two pictures are the same, and folks should take... time, if they haven't already,

Speaker:

to look up a map of the Gaza Strip and imagine that entire population is now into that bottom

Speaker:

southern corner, south of Chanyunis, and that's about 1.6 million people. The numbers are really

Speaker:

hard to define at this point, but you know, you've got definitely over a million people.

Speaker:

all displaced, most of them living on the streets are in tents, and now they're being treated

Speaker:

the same way in the North, where they're being told to evacuate, and there's absolutely no

Speaker:

work for them to go. And during this kind of movement from Khan Yunus, where a lot had settled,

Speaker:

to Ra'afah, was when Mansour Soumin was reported missing. Now if you, again, have been living

Speaker:

under a rock or something and haven't heard about Canadian-Palestinian journalist Mansour

Speaker:

Soumin, he was... reported to have been abducted by the IDF. None of that has been confirmed.

Speaker:

All that we do know is his family and his support team lost contact with him for about two weeks.

Speaker:

And the response here, Canada side, was immense. There was a petition that went out that quickly

Speaker:

gained lots of signatures and you even got the Prime Minister actually making a statement.

Speaker:

trying to express some bullshit concern. I don't know what. what happened, but we do know that

Speaker:

he is back on air. He is back reporting from a conunis in the Gaza Strip. And you can, I'll

Speaker:

link his IG, his Instagram account, so people can see for themselves. But I think that was

Speaker:

a relief for people. But it also again brings up the discussion how like no journalists are

Speaker:

safe. And the Canadian media here is doing such an abysmal job. Jesse

Speaker:

This man is not even pretending to be a journalist anymore. He had nothing to say about Selena

Speaker:

Robinson's anti-Palestinian racism, like, at all, even though that was the story in Canadian

Speaker:

media for the entire weekend. The only time he chimed in was, of course, to comment on

Speaker:

the awful vandalism that happened outside of her office and to label it as anti-Semitism.

Speaker:

So... The fact that this guy still has his platform is astonishing. I wonder what their subscription

Speaker:

list looks like now. Yeah, no, I mean, it's such a free fall. The way that Jesse Brown

Speaker:

has just completely fallen apart. And it's not even just like Israel Palestine stuff. He's

Speaker:

like talking about like, he's like defending AI porn and stuff, like making people's image

Speaker:

and like, what the hell? Like this guy completely lost it. What the hell is wrong with him? Speaking

Speaker:

of people who lost their way, Joe Roberts is no longer with J-Space. We can speculate all

Speaker:

we want. We're going to tell ourselves that they finally rid themselves of that Zionist.

Speaker:

Fun fact, the very next day, or at least like maybe two days, but very soon after they announce

Speaker:

his departure. they release a statement that Canada should reinstate funding to UNRWA. So

Speaker:

I wonder if maybe Joe was holding that statement back, because as we know, Zionists don't actually

Speaker:

make up the majority of the Jewish population, and the views that they hold are not inherently

Speaker:

Jewish. And so that was nice to see coming out of J-Space to take that stand, that had gone

Speaker:

too far. But, yeah, it's... Unfortunately, there's no shortage of figures on the left. All of

Speaker:

these feel like they should be in quotations that are really feeding into the narratives

Speaker:

that we try so hard to tear down. And so I guess that's why we have such gripes with them. It

Speaker:

feels like we're having to undo their handiwork all the time or maybe vice versa. Yeah, no,

Speaker:

I mean, it's. It's it's. Sorry, I don't even know where to go with this because it's so...

Speaker:

Like it's comical, but it also shows like, you know, don't put anyone on a pedestal. Least

Speaker:

of us don't put us on a pedestal, you know? Like don't put... No, nobody, no one figure

Speaker:

represents the left and we're all, you know, people that need to be held accountable. Those

Speaker:

of us who are searching for platforms, those of us who are trying to like speak. We all

Speaker:

need to be held accountable, you know? Like, I sure hope that like, if I ever said something

Speaker:

that fucking absurd, that people would be holding me accountable, and I hope that I would be,

Speaker:

you know, mature enough to listen. But yeah, it's, there are no heroes, you know? This is

Speaker:

about all of us. It's not about any one of us. And... So the Jesse Rob, the Jesse Browns and

Speaker:

the Joe Roberts and everyone like, you know, it's, heed the warning signs, right? Yeah,

Speaker:

clearly there's no heroes because I'm a little bit older. I feel like I grew up surrounded

Speaker:

by music that was a little bit revolutionary. I'm not gonna start naming artists, but I just

Speaker:

kind of grew up with the impression that musicians often use their music for a cause. Should and

Speaker:

perhaps that's just my whole mentality that anybody with a platform should use it in particularly

Speaker:

times like this

Speaker:

Again we've talked about how I don't really possess a filter So I perhaps can never maybe

Speaker:

that's why I never apply one But I'm kind of talking about the entertainment industry and

Speaker:

the Grammys just happened I didn't watch them. I don't watch those things generally, but you

Speaker:

know, you can't help but get a summary of events through social media. And I guess I expected

Speaker:

in this moment somebody to get up or multiple people to try to press this issue to perhaps

Speaker:

be dressed in black, red, white, and green. Anything to try to draw attention to use. this

Speaker:

kind of huge platform. And only Annie Lennox did, right? There was an immemorial portion

Speaker:

that they get through and she did, she held up her fist and she made comments there. And

Speaker:

that was it. And it was hosted by a South African. So my disappointment in Trevor Noah extends

Speaker:

far beyond the Grammys. I mean, I once heard him tell a joke about... South African miners

Speaker:

just being completely slaughtered by police. And it was a real kind of class war joke that

Speaker:

rubbed me the wrong way. So I've not liked him for since I heard that. But it does disappoint

Speaker:

me because he has been on the record for Palestine as have other artists. But some of them are

Speaker:

just so silent now. And shit like Roger Waters just got dropped from his label. That man has

Speaker:

been part of the BDS movement for Decades he has been so outspoken his concert backgrounds

Speaker:

are often a political message mostly about Palestine and Now they decide to drop them. I mean, I

Speaker:

don't know like you said there are no heroes and I shouldn't expect it But I think I did

Speaker:

at least out of musicians But as a musician Can you agree with me here? Do you? You just

Speaker:

think it's the same old, same old, that particular industry, like every other industry. Just,

Speaker:

there's no space for it. And to be fair, it's not all musicians, right? It's the ones that

Speaker:

get platforms like the Grammys, right? Um, because, you know, I mean, I might use the example of

Speaker:

Low-Key, you know, one of my favorite rappers. And I discovered him through his music, not

Speaker:

through his commentary, but he hasn't taken a day off. Since then, I'm not sure he's sleeping.

Speaker:

No, like he's been a relentless warrior for the cause, right? So, you know, shout out again,

Speaker:

as always, to Loki. You know, people like Macklemore put out a statement. Shout out to him, you

Speaker:

know, I wasn't surprised by that. People are surprised that he's always spoken about these

Speaker:

things. But I guess there are some people that were there that I expect him maybe do more.

Speaker:

Killer Mike's an example. You know, Killer Mike, he does speak out for a lot of things, but

Speaker:

you know, he I don't even know who won Grammys. I don't even know anything about who was there.

Speaker:

I just know I saw some clips of Killer Mike there, so and I didn't hear about him speaking,

Speaker:

so um but yeah, I mean history also hasn't been kind to a lot of artists who have spoken out,

Speaker:

right? Sinead O'Connor comes to mind as someone who had it pretty rough for things that we

Speaker:

all now know. She was right about her. Well, Annie Lennox was actually singing one of her

Speaker:

songs during the memoriam because Sinead O'Connor passed away this year. So it's funny that you

Speaker:

had tied her to that. And even currently, you know, kind of like Hollywood related, but...

Speaker:

Susan Sarandon, she was dropped by her agency for showing up at Palestinian solidarity rallies.

Speaker:

There's the Scream franchise blew up, the young actress there, Melissa Barbera, she was openly

Speaker:

fired for her views on Palestine. And there's a great article of her kind of pushing back

Speaker:

on that in the Rolling Stone, being vindicated of sorts. But it's the same pressures that

Speaker:

exist in the academia. and the political world. So I think that's what made the Selena Robinson

Speaker:

case important for the points that we discussed already at the beginning of the episode. But

Speaker:

also, you know, it's one of the first times that we've seen somebody be removed from an

Speaker:

important position for being a Zionist. And I think, like, there's some people in my mentions

Speaker:

sometimes trying to... force me to make space for Zionism, as though I should tolerate Zionism,

Speaker:

and I don't, just for the record, I don't think it's a legitimate ideology. I think it's harmful.

Speaker:

I'm not talking about whether or not they should be able to say what they need to say. I just

Speaker:

think it shouldn't exist. There shouldn't be political systems based on Zionism. So it's

Speaker:

just, it feels like that's part of the tide turning. Although the retributions against

Speaker:

pro-Palestinian activists has surely not ended, the fact that pressure finally paid off against

Speaker:

the impunity for which Zionists had been operating, as though they could just hold these positions

Speaker:

that erase Palestinians in their mind and spout them and still hold a job in elected office.

Speaker:

And that's no longer the case. So May all the Zionists elected officials out there know that

Speaker:

we're coming for them. But to be clear, you can be a Zionist and be in political office.

Speaker:

You just can't be openly racist and a Zionist. And, you know, I disagree. I think in a Canadian

Speaker:

office, there shouldn't be a politician that believes one set of people are deserving of

Speaker:

an exclusive homeland. Sorry, let me be clear. I I don't think that they should be. I mean

Speaker:

more that like clearly they're allowed to, like clearly they get space to as long as they don't,

Speaker:

you know, as long as they're slick about it, right? As long as they hide these views. Yes,

Speaker:

so their policies will still reflect a Zionist ideology, but don't you dare spout that shit

Speaker:

in a Zionist lobby webinar that's going to be posted. online afterwards. So you'll have to

Speaker:

at least couch your language or be a little bit more careful. But the fact that it's just

Speaker:

like not legitimate anymore. And it had been for so long, like people have been saying this

Speaker:

nonsense for a long time, they still say it. But now we have an example of where we held

Speaker:

them accountable and we drew a line. So I hope that's a trend.

Speaker:

over until the genocide ends, until there's a free Palestine, like... We need to keep putting

Speaker:

that pressure. We need to keep fighting. We need to keep putting papers of tape and chalk

Speaker:

and much more than that on all the politicians' office. And people like Melanie Jolie shouldn't

Speaker:

get a peaceful night's sleep because I can tell you that the children of Gaza are not getting

Speaker:

a peaceful night's sleep with the bombs dropping over their head. So I see no reason why Melanie

Speaker:

Jolie should herself, so. Yeah, we need to keep at it and not expect, and also, like, I think

Speaker:

if there's a theme from all of this, it's not expecting those in power to act in the interests

Speaker:

of anyone other than those in power because they've shown you time and again what this

Speaker:

is. They have their class consciousness. They know who they are. And we know who we are,

Speaker:

you know. Don't confuse them as anything but. I don't know. That is a wrap on another episode

Speaker:

of Blueprints of Disruption. Thank you for joining us. Also, a very big thank you to the producer

Speaker:

of our show, Santiago Halu-Quintero. Blueprints of Disruption is an independent production

Speaker:

operated cooperatively. You can follow us on Twitter at BPofDisruption. If you'd like to

Speaker:

help us continue disrupting the status quo, please share our content. And if you have the

Speaker:

means, consider becoming a patron. Not only does our support come from the progressive

Speaker:

community, so does our content. So reach out to us and let us know what or who we should

Speaker:

be amplifying. So until next time, keep disrupting.

Listen for free

Show artwork for Blueprints of Disruption

About the Podcast

Blueprints of Disruption
Blueprints of Disruption is dedicated to amplifying the work of activists, organizers and rabble rousers. This weekly podcast, hosted by Jessa McLean and Santiago Helou Quintero, features in-depth discussions that explore different ways to challenge capitalism, decolonize spaces and create movements on the ground. Together we will disrupt the status quo one Thursday at a time.

About your hosts

Jessa McLean

Profile picture for Jessa McLean
Host, Jessa McLean is a socialist political and community organizer from Ontario.

Santiago Helou Quintero

Profile picture for Santiago Helou Quintero
Producer